WASHINGTON (Reuters) — In a significant shake-up of the U.S. military’s leadership structure, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced on Monday a sweeping plan to reduce the number of four-star generals and admirals by 20%. This move deepens the ongoing efforts to streamline the Department of Defense under President Donald Trump’s second term, signaling a push toward a leaner and more efficient military leadership.
Major Cutbacks Across the Military
According to an internal memo first reported by Reuters, Secretary Hegseth’s directive doesn’t stop at four-star positions. It also mandates at least a 20% reduction in the number of general officers in the National Guard. Furthermore, an additional 10% cut will be applied to general and flag officers across all branches of the military.
These reductions are part of a broader strategy to optimize the military’s command structure by eliminating redundant leadership positions. The ultimate goal is to ensure that the U.S. military remains a potent force capable of deterring threats and securing victories when called upon.
Statement on Military Readiness
In his memo, Hegseth underscored the importance of maintaining the combat effectiveness of U.S. armed forces. “The Department of Defense is committed to ensuring the lethality of U.S. Military Forces to deter threats and, when necessary, achieve decisive victory,” he wrote.
Hegseth emphasized that cutting excess leadership roles is a key part of improving military performance. By “removing redundant force structure,” the military can “optimize and streamline leadership,” making the chain of command more agile and effective.
A Long-Standing Criticism of Top-Heavy Leadership
Secretary Hegseth’s concerns over the size of the military’s top ranks are not new. Even before his appointment, he voiced strong opinions about the bloated nature of military leadership.
During his Senate confirmation hearing, Hegseth noted, “there’s an inverse relationship between the size of staffs and victory on the battlefield.” His comment reflected a belief that large, bureaucratic staffs can hinder rather than help military success.
In line with his vision, Hegseth has already taken dramatic steps to reshape military leadership. Notably, he has dismissed several high-ranking officers, including the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Navy’s top admiral, as well as other senior flag officers. These removals signal his determination to challenge the traditional structure and make the military more responsive and effective.
Broader Context of Pentagon Reforms
This announcement comes amid broader efforts by the Trump administration to overhaul key government institutions, including the Pentagon. Trump’s second term has been marked by a push for reform, cost-cutting, and efficiency across federal agencies, with the Department of Defense under particular scrutiny.
Hegseth’s reductions are part of this larger pattern, reflecting the administration’s desire to redirect resources away from bloated bureaucracies and toward frontline readiness and combat capabilities. The belief is that a leaner leadership will translate into a more focused and agile military force.
Reactions and Implications
While some inside and outside the Pentagon may welcome these reforms as necessary for modern warfare, others have expressed concern over the potential impact on military operations and morale. Critics argue that cutting senior leadership positions may risk weakening oversight, mentorship, and strategic planning within the ranks.
On the other hand, supporters point to the benefits of trimming unnecessary roles, arguing that it can reduce bureaucracy, foster innovation, and give more authority and responsibility to lower-level commanders.
A Turning Point for U.S. Military Leadership
The reduction of four-star and other high-ranking officers represents one of the most significant structural changes in the U.S. military in recent years. It marks a turning point in how the Pentagon is run, with a clear shift toward leaner leadership and an emphasis on combat readiness over administrative layers.
As the cuts go into effect, military analysts and policymakers will closely watch how these changes play out on the ground. The success or failure of this reform effort could influence U.S. defense strategy and military culture for years to come.
Key Points:
- 20% cut in four-star officers ordered by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth
- Additional 20% reduction in National Guard generals
- Further 10% cut in general and flag officers across the military
- Cuts aim to streamline command, reduce bureaucracy, and improve effectiveness
- Follows prior removals of top military leaders, including the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
- Part of broader Trump administration reforms focusing on efficiency and cost-cutting